- Details
-
Tuesday, 05 May 2026
-
Written by Troy Williams
Throughout his presidency and campaigns, there have been three notable attempts on the life of President Donald J. Trump, highlighting the serious threats faced by national leaders. While these events are reported widely, it's important to consider multiple sources and perspectives to understand the full context. Both Democrats and Republicans are engaging in a lively discussion about their roles in the current rhetoric, highlighting their differing perspectives on this crucial issue.
Is the President directly responsible for the violence directed against him? When it comes to the death threats, my answer is no. However, his political opponents are communicating in ways that could incite individuals who are already on the edge of mental instability to engage in dangerous behaviors. This not only threatens the President but also endangers all citizens.
This situation is unfolding on a national level, but its impact is also deeply felt in our local politics. We must acknowledge and address these connections to strengthen our community. Despite our varying political beliefs, we are still neighbors and part of the same community, united by shared values and a commitment to understanding one another.
It is concerning that some members of the community rely heavily on national leaders' guidance rather than considering local perspectives. Democrats are increasingly using race as a divisive issue. Given that discussions around race can evoke strong emotions, the community must be aware of this manipulation. We should promote critical engagement with political rhetoric that encourages citizens to think independently.
Democrats are understandably reluctant to address the recent federal indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center due to the party's historical support for the organization. The SPLC is a well-known nonprofit that tracks hate groups and fights against racism. The central allegations against the SPLC include wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering. Specifically, it is accused of paying informants within hate groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, to fabricate and agitate instances of racism to justify its existence. Revelations like these are always difficult to accept, but if they are proven true, there should be no need for a cover-up. It is essential to let the truth come out, regardless of the consequences.
In a democracy, you are considered innocent until proven guilty. However, a federal indictment carries more weight than just accusations. If the charges against the SPLC are validated, it could reveal important insights into the current state of race relations in America.
We need to lower the temperature and engage in civil political dialogue. The behavior often seen in Washington, D.C., and Raleigh should not be tolerated. Is it fair to compare America to Nazi Germany? I don't believe so. While we are not perfect, Trump is not akin to Hitler. Making such extreme comparisons is irresponsible and only stirs up division. We are better than this.
- Details
-
Tuesday, 28 April 2026
-
Written by John Hood
Most federal, state, and local policymakers are saying the right things about housing. Our leaders say they want to make it easier for young people to purchase homes and for older people to keep them. But are they doing enough to turn their words into deeds?
To make housing more affordable, we must build more of it. Expand supply to meet demand, and prices will adjust accordingly. That’s how the market process works. And this comports with the findings of most empirical research on the issue, which shows a positive relationship between barriers to new housing and its average price.
How can policymakers encourage more housing supply? By easing regulations that limit where new housing can go, how many units can be constructed per acre, and how many (non-safety) amenities are required. By streamlining the process to get a building permit. By eliminating tariffs on lumber, steel, appliances, fixtures, and other goods used to produce housing for sale. And by creating more ways for skilled workers to emigrate legally to the country to fill construction jobs, while also encouraging and training young people to enter the field.
Want to make it easier for households to obtain mortgages? Rather than monkeying around with price controls or pressuring the Federal Reserve to lower rates, policymakers should go after one of the primary pressures on credit markets: Washington’s reckless deficit-spending. When the government is borrowing heavily, Adam Millsap of Stand Together Trust argues, “it has to increase interest rates to attract more investors,” and then those higher Treasury rates “push up mortgage rates, as well as car loans, small business loans, credit card rates, etc.”
These aren’t new ideas. Outside the fever swamps of populist and socialist agitation, they aren’t even particularly controversial ideas. But applying them consistently can be difficult. Every zoning code, bureaucratic delay, import tax, and labor-market regulation has a political constituency — someone who gains, or at least expects to gain, by shutting others out.
Despite these challenges, state and local leaders in North Carolina have implemented some important reforms in recent years. As a result, we are, indeed, better off than most places. According to the latest data I could find, only Idaho is adding new housing stock at a faster rate than North Carolina is. Among large metropolitan areas, Raleigh-Cary topped the list with 28.8 new units per 1,000 existing homes, followed by Austin (28.6), Dallas (22.2), Houston (21.6), and Phoenix (21.4). Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia came in sixth with 21.3. Among mid-size metros, both Wilmington (1) and Asheville (10) ranked high. Among small metros, Burlington ranked fifth.
Because North Carolina is adding population faster than the nation as a whole, such increases in supply won’t necessarily yank housing prices dramatically downward. What they will do — what they already seem to have done — is lessen the upward pressure on prices, and produce modest declines in some local and regional markets.
Now is no time to pause, however. Some of our competitors are pressing forward with ambitious reforms. Colorado and Arizona, for example, have adopted statewide reforms to permit residential uses in commercial zones, allow single-stair multifamily designs, and ease parking mandates. Lawmakers in Florida, Idaho, and Virginia have enacted bills requiring their municipalities to legalize manufactured homes within their jurisdictions. I’ve long been an advocate for this policy, which taps the tremendous potential of mass production and automation to serve a broad swath of price-sensitive workers, young families, and retirees.
Matching words with deeds on housing is the right thing to do. It’s also the politically astute thing to do. Affordability remains a top priority for voters. A recent High Point University poll revealed significant pessimism among North Carolina voters, with 59% describing America’s economy as getting worse rather than better, 54% opposing the administration’s tariffs, and 81% saying price increases have greatly or somewhat affected their spending decisions.
Many barriers make housing artificially scarce and thus inordinately expensive. We can’t afford to keep talking about them. They must come down.
Editor's Note: John Hood is a John Locke Foundation board member. His books Mountain Folk, Forest Folk, and Water Folk combine epic fantasy with American history (FolkloreCycle.com).