Views

Publisher's Pen: Dead center: Wake-up call for political civility

Details

Tuesday, 07 October 2025

Written by Bill Bowman

I’m recommending to all my friends—Democrats and Republicans alike—that they read former Senator Joe Manchin’s new book, Dead Center: In Defense of Common Sense.
It’s a compelling and timely reminder that in politics, listening, compromise, cooperation, and civility are essential to progress. Sadly, these qualities are becoming increasingly rare at every level of government.
For nearly 30 years, my focus has remained squarely on the quality of life in Fayetteville and Cumberland County, with a consistent emphasis on leadership in local government. Unfortunately, this past week has not been our proudest moment.
On Sept. 29, a video went viral showing a female supporter of Mayor Mitch Colvin verbally attacking a female poll worker for mayoral candidate Mario Benavente. The barrage of obscenities was shocking, and the confrontation escalated to the point where the abused poll worker charged the aggressor with intent to cause bodily harm. Thankfully, Benavente intervened and restrained her, preventing physical violence. This behavior is totally unbecoming of our local Democrats.
However, not to be outdone, Cumberland County Republicans hosted their own “fight night” on Oct. 2 at Peter Pappas’ converted Baldino’s restaurant, now the Republican Resource Center on Owen Drive. There, two factions of the local GOP exchanged insults and accusations, exposing their internal divisions and contradictory agendas. These are the same individuals who organize prayer vigils and solidarity marches in honor of Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk, while shamelessly promoting his doctrine. Unfortunately, they “talk the talk” but fail to “walk the walk.”
Thursday evening may well have been their own “turning point,” as two prominent GOP women—Cumberland County GOP Board Member Laura Mussler and Calista Cuevas, local director of Moms for Liberty—engaged in a heated exchange that turned physical and ended with police intervention and both parties filing misdemeanor assault charges against one another. You can read the full account of the melee in Paul Woolverton’s October 3rd article in CityView. Spoiler alert: it reads like a supermarket tabloid. Both women are scheduled to appear before a judge in November. One can’t help but imagine Judge Judy presiding.
These incidents are just two recent examples of the toxic discourse plaguing politics today. There’s no communication, no empathy, no willingness to listen or compromise. It’s become a race for power and control, rather than a pursuit of public service..
“It’s not about power—it’s about people. Civility, compromise, and common sense must return to the center of our politics.”
A recent poll found that 82% of Americans believe political discourse has gone too far and that both major parties have become too extreme—abandoning the common-sense middle ground.
We’re seeing this firsthand in Fayetteville and Cumberland County, and that’s why this Nov. 7, we must vote for candidates who prioritize humanity, civility, and cooperation. Our future depends on it.
This being said, I strongly recommend to everyone who loves our community, state, and nation to:

Thank you for reading Up & Coming Weekly community newspaper.

Popularity is exactly what we want

Details

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

Written by John Hood

What is the most popular state in the continental United States? You guessed it: our own North Carolina.
That’s the headline from a recent YouGov survey of more than 2,000 American adults. Asked whether they had a favorable or unfavorable opinion of each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia, 68% of respondents expressed a favorable view of Hawaii. The second-highest favorability rating was North Carolina’s 62%, followed by Alaska (61%), Tennessee (60%), and Colorado (59%).
Of course, to say North Carolina is a highly regarded state is not to say it is equally popular across subgroups of respondents. As you might expect to see within today’s political context, assessments differ sharply by partisan affiliation.
The share of Democrats with a favorable view of California (86%) was far higher than the share of Republicans who view it favorably (23%). On the flipside, Florida was viewed favorably by 83% of Republicans and 36% of Democrats. One reason the Tar Heel State fared so well in the rankings is that the partisan spread isn’t so huge, with 73% of Republicans and 59% of Democrats expressing a favorable view.
Could this be in part because of divided government? For most of the past 15 years, Democrats have held our governorship and Republicans have controlled our state legislature. Perhaps that gives voters in both partisan coalitions a sense of empowerment. As it happens, other states with divided government also exhibited relatively modest gaps in partisan favorably, including Arizona (64% among Republicans, 57% among Democrats), Pennsylvania (52% and 66% respectively), Wisconsin (53% and 57%), and Virginia (61% and 62%).
This isn’t a hard-and-fast rule, however. Kentucky and Michigan also feature divided government, but much larger partisan gaps in favorability.
Other drivers of North Carolina’s national popularity are surely our strong job growth and (relatively) modest cost of living. I don’t necessarily mean that poll respondents are intimately familiar with economic statistics. But plenty of Americans know personally or have heard about people moving to North Carolina to better their economic prospects. They sense, correctly, that our state is on the upswing. Last year, only Texas experienced more net domestic migration (+85,267) than did North Carolina (+82,288).
Yet another factor is aesthetics. Hawaii and Alaska aren’t economic powerhouses, actually, yet they earn high favorability for their natural beauty and recreational opportunities. North Carolina, Tennessee, and Colorado have the good fortune to be attractive to both visitors and job seekers.
While our beaches, mountains, and resort communities make a great impression, our “charm advantage” is broader than that. In a related survey, YouGov asked a favorability question about America’s 50 largest cities. When respondents were limited to assessing only the cities they’d personally visited, the one with the highest net favorability was Raleigh, at +73%. Colorado Springs (+69%), San Antonio (+69%), Virginia Beach (+66%), Charlotte (+65%), and Nashville (+65%) formed the rest of the top tier.
The cities with the worst net-favorability ratings among those who’ve visited them included Baltimore (+6%), Fresno (+2%), Oakland (-4%), Detroit (-5%), and Bakersfield (-10%).
I sometimes hear my fellow North Carolina natives grumble about culture clashes, congestion, and other growth-related challenges. I remind them of two facts. First, while we continue to import lots of people every year, the share of domestic newcomers to longtime residents hasn’t changed as much as you’d think. This is a nationwide phenomenon. Contrary to popular impression, today’s Americans are less likely to relocate across state lines than previous generations were.
Second, I point out that for every challenge associated with (relatively) high population growth, there are multiple challenges associated with low growth. Stagnation is nothing to celebrate. And the ultimate resource isn’t oil, or manufacturing capacity, or lovely fall foliage. It’s people.
North Carolina’s in-migration rate is higher than the national median. So is our fertility rate. We should aspire to do even better, to make our state the most popular place to live, work, get married, and have children. The more the merrier!

Editor’s Note: John Hood is a John Locke Foundation board member. His books Mountain Folk, Forest Folk, and Water Folk combine epic fantasy with American history (FolkloreCycle.com).

Pitt, Grimm’s Fairy Tales presents: The Riddle

Details

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

Written by Pitt Dickey

Welcome back to the wonderful world of Grimm’s Fairy Tales. Today, we enter a forest to meet a Prince, his faithful but clumsy servant, 12 murderers, and a Princess. The truth shall set you free. Unless you are questioned by the police, you are advised to consult with an attorney before answering questions. The Prince in our story gets interrogated by a Princess. Spoiler Alert: Despite telling her the truth, it turns out OK for the Prince. Remember, this is a fairy tale. Any resemblance to real life is purely coincidental.
Once upon a time, a Prince came down with wanderlust. He rode into the forest with his trusty servant to seek adventure. Near dark, he began looking for a place to spend the night. He found a cottage in the woods with a beautiful girl standing outside the door. He asked if they could spend the night. She warned him that her wicked stepmother lived there and not to eat or drink anything she offered him. The Prince did not fear witches, but he did not consume any food or drink just to be safe. The next morning, the Prince rode away before his servant finished saddling his horse. The witch offered the servant a cup of ale to take to the Prince. The servant, who was a butter-fingered lout, spilled the cup on his horse. The horse immediately died as the witch’s brew was poison.
The servant caught up with the Prince. On returning to the cottage to retrieve the abandoned saddle, they found a raven eating the eye of the dead horse. Unsure of when or if they would find food, they killed the raven and took it with them for supper. That evening, they saw an inn in the woods. The servant gave the innkeeper the raven to cook for their supper. It turned out that twelve murderers were also staying at the inn. The innkeeper was about to serve the Prince when the murderers grabbed the raven stew for themselves. After one bite, each of the murderers died because the raven had been poisoned by eating the horse’s eyeball.
The innkeeper skedaddled from the inn, leaving his beautiful daughter behind. She showed the Prince where the murderers had hidden all their stolen treasures. Being an honest man, he refused her offer to take the robber’s stolen booty.
Next, the Prince rode into a town ruled by the King. The King had a beautiful daughter who prided herself on being the greatest riddle solver in the world. She promised to marry anyone who could ask her a riddle she could not solve in 3 days. If she solved the riddle, then her suitor would have his head chopped off. Nine men tried and nine men died. The Prince, being smitten by her beauty, took up her challenge. He asked her this riddle: “One killed none, but still killed twelve. Who was it?”
The Princess was stumped. She sent her maid to sneak into the Prince’s bed chamber to try to overhear if he talked in his sleep about the riddle. On the first night, the Prince faked sleep. He snatched the maid’s robe and chased her away with a stick. He did the same on the second night, again snatching her robe. Finally, on the third night, the Princess herself stole into his room. He pretended to be asleep as the Princess whispered his riddle into his ear. He gave her the answer: “A raven ate the flesh of a dead horse that was poisoned and died itself. Then 12 murderers ate the raven stew and died.” He grabbed her royal robe when she ran from his room.
The next morning, the Princess proudly announced she had solved the riddle. She presented her explanation to the court’s 12 Riddle Masters. It appeared the Prince was doomed. Then he explained that he had been awake and given her the answer, as she would never have figured it out on her own. The Riddle Masters asked for proof. He produced the 3 robes from the maids and the Princess to prove his story was true. The Riddle Masters ruled in his favor that he had stumped the Princess. She had to marry him. He ultimately inherited the entire Kingdom when her father died.
MORAL: This is possibly the only documented time a man telling a woman the truth worked out well for the man. Remember, this is a fairy tale. Gentlemen, don’t try this at home. As Tony Soprano said to Dr. Melfi: “Is this a woman thing? You ask me how I am feeling. I tell you how I’m feeling, and now you’re gonna torture me with it?” No ravens were harmed during the writing of this column.

(Illustration by Pitt Dickey)

Troy's Perspective: Keep using ShotSpotter?

Details

Wednesday, 24 September 2025

Written by Troy Williams

On Sept. 8, the Fayetteville City Council voted 8-2 to extend the controversial ShotSpotter technology utilized by the Fayetteville Police Department for another year for $220,000.
Councilmembers Mario Benavente and Deno Hondros stood firm in their opposition, casting their votes against the measure.
Fayetteville's new police chief, Roberto Bryan, supports the use of ShotSpotter technology. Chief Bryan, an African American, provides a contrasting perspective on the somewhat controversial use of this technology in African American communities.
African American concerns center around civil liberties, the potential for over-policing, and the perception that ShotSpotter creates a false sense of security. Critics argue that the technology offers poor returns on investment, pointing to low rates of arrests and gun recoveries. On the other hand, supporters assert that it can enable a rapid response to gunfire incidents.
ShotSpotter claims a high accuracy rate of around 97%. However, critics and independent research indicate that the system often fails to produce evidence of gun-related crimes. A study conducted in Chicago revealed that 89% of the deployments did not yield any evidence of such crimes.
Similarly, a study in New York showed a success rate ranging from only 8% to 20% during specific periods. Additionally, an independent study conducted in Fayetteville by the Wilson Center for Science and Justice at Duke Law has also raised questions about the effectiveness of this technology.
Gun violence in America has reached alarming levels, posing a serious threat to our communities and way of life. The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on a university campus in Utah, along with a shooting at a high school in Colorado—which resulted in the shooter's death from self-inflicted wounds, two student deaths, and three others injured, both incidents on the same day—highlights the ongoing issue of gun violence in the country.
Many African Americans oppose ShotSpotter technology, and while it may contribute more to the problem than to the solution, it is essential to acknowledge the stark reality: the risk of homicide is significantly higher in the Black community compared to the white community. Black Americans are more than 12 times more likely to die from gun homicides than white Americans.
Gun violence is the leading cause of death for African American males aged 15 to 34, and Fayetteville joins other major cities with high homicide rates. The shooters and victims typically share the same racial background. At some point, we all hope this cycle of violence comes to an end. Elected leaders and law enforcement officials are understandably seeking answers to the situation. The challenges they face are significant.
They need to set both immediate and future goals to drive success and ensure progress.
Could the $220,000 have had a more meaningful impact if allocated differently?
Perhaps, but Fayetteville needs to significantly increase its crime prevention budget for genuine effectiveness. Efforts to solve our gun violence problem with ShotSpotter are further dividing those who need help and those sworn to assist them.
This isn't a solution that benefits everyone; it's a scenario where one side wins while the other loses.